Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Jan 8, 2022
Abstract
The analysis of borders in Latin America, particularly in South America, tends to tackle problems from isolated approaches. However, the creation of policies that allow for the solution of regional border problems requires an integrated analysis of the various viewpoints. In this respect, the concept of Integrated Border Management, which the European Union considers applicable in South American countries, is particularly relevant. It is consequently interesting to follow the debate on how a mechanism developed in Europe can become essential in border management policies against drug trafficking on the agendas of integration organisations in South America. Accordingly, our aim is to evaluate, through the analysis of CAN, MERCOSUR and UNASURintegration processes, how the available instruments of the different experiences in South American integration can have an impact on border management against drug trafficking.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
ANDERSON, J. (1999). Regional Integration and Democracy: expanding on the European experience. Lanham: Rowman & Li$lefield.
ARRIAGADA, I., & HOPENHAYN, M. (2000). Producción, tráfico y consumo de drogas en América Latina. Santiago: CEPAL.
BIGO, D. (2006). Globalized (In)Security: the field and the ban-opticon. In: Bigo, D. et al. Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes, the (In)Security Games, Paris: Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits y L’Harma$an, pp. 5-49.
BUZAN, B. (2008). The evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CARRIÓN, F. (2013). Introducción. In F. e. Carrión, Fronteras: rupturas y convergencias (pp. 9-30). Quito: FLACSO Ecuador.
DE CASTRO GARCÍA, A. (2014). VI Jornadas de Estudios de Seguridad. Gestión fronteriza contra el narcotráfico en Chile. Plan Vigía y Plan Frontera Norte. Madrid: Instituto Universitario General Gutierrez Mellado.
DE CASTRO, A. (2015). Gestión fronteriza contra el narcotráfico en España, Brasil y Chile: una propuesta para Chile. Madrid: Instituto Universitario General Gutierrez Mellado.
EUROPEAN MONITORING CENTRE ON DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION. (2014). European Drug Report 2014. Lisboa: Unión Europea.
GAUHAR, A. (1985). Regional integration. The Latin American experience. Boulder: Westview press. London: Third world fundation for social and economic studies. p.p XVII + 282
GIMENEZ, V., & MONTENEGRO, S. (2010). Representaciones de la integración y sus obstáculos: políticos y funcionarios piensan la frontera. In V. Gimenez, & S. Montenegro, La triple frontera: dinámicas culturales y procesos (pp. 1-1). Buenos Aires: Espacio Editorial.
HOBBING, P. (2005). Integrated Border Management at the EU level. CEPS Working Document, 227.
h$p://aei.pi$.edu/6672/1/1254_227.pdf
JOHNSON, T. (2011). Social Justice, Equality and Empowerement: Acculturation: Implications for Individuals, Families and Societies. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
KICZA, J. (1993). The Indian in Latin American History: Resistance, Resilience and Acculturation. Durham: Duke University Press.
MALAMUD, C. (2012). La Alianza del Pacífico: un revulsivo para la integración regional en América Latina. Madrid: ARI 46/2012.
MALAMUD, C. (2006). La salida venezolana de la Comunidad Andina de Naciones y sus repercusiones sobre la integración regional. Madrid: ARI 54/2006.
MARENIN, O. (2010). Challenges for Integrated Border Management in the European Union. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
MONTENEGRO, S. (2013). La Triple Frontera entre Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay. In F. Carrión, Fronteras: rupturas y convergencias (pp. 241-254). Quito: FLACSO Ecuador.
NEWMAN, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our “borderless” world. Progress in Human Geography, 30 (2), pp. 143-161. United States of America
PAPADODIMA, Z. (2011). Las fronteras regionales: La Materia de migraciones en la geopolítica contemporánea. Cuadernos Geográficos, 48 (2011-1), pp. 189-205.
PUMPHREY, C. (2000). Transnational Threats blending Law Enforcement and Military Strategies. Carlisle: US Army War College.
REDFIELD, R., LINTON, R., & HERSKOVITS, M. (1936). Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation.
American Anthropologist , pp. 149-152.
RHI SAUSI, J. L., & ODDONE, N. (2013). La cooperación transfronteriza entre unidades subnacionales del MERCOSUR. In F. e. Carrión, Fronteras: rupturas y convergencias (pp. 215-240). Quito: FLACSO Ecuador.
SAVINO, L. (2013). The quest for territorial autonomy: Mapuche political identities under neoliberal multiculturalism in Argentina. London, Canadá: University of Western Ontario.
SIEGEL, D., & VAN DE BUNT, H. (2012). Traditional organized crime in the modern world. Nueva York: Springer.
TRATADO GENERAL DE INTEGRACIÓN ECONÓMICA CENTROAMERICANO FIRMADO EN NICARAGUA. (1960). Managua.
UGARTE, J. M. (2014). UNASUR y la coordinación de políticas antidroga. In El narcotráfico y su combate: sus efectos sobre las relaciones internacionales (pp. 148-162). Ciudad de Mexico: KAS.
UNODC. (2008). A century of international drug control. Viena: UNODC.
UNODC. (2014). World Drug Report. Viena: UNODC.
VINICIUS, M. (2014). The Brazilian role on the creation of UNASUR: an ambiguous path. Quito: FLACSO
Ecuador.
