Main Article Content

Published:
Jan 8, 2022
Keywords:
Local welfare systems
Megalopolis
Mexico
Mexico City
Territory

Abstract

Social policy and welfare studies have recently re-incorporating the notions of territory, space and scale. Overall, this literature departs from the recognition that there is tendency towards a more localized welfare provision in practically most countries in the Western world, due to, among other factors, different process of decentralization in the last four decades. However, most of the discussion around scale, territory and local welfare systems have mostly focused on industrialized countries. This paper discusses the use of scale, territory and space in the analysis of local welfare systems. The aim of this papers is twofold. First, this paper analyses how the notion of scale, space and territory are used to study social policy in the context of cities. Second, this paper provides some theoretical insights to analyse local welfare systems in megalopolis, such as Mexico City.

Anahely Medrano
How to Cite
(2022). Social policy and the territorial dimension: insights for analysing the welfare systems of cities in the Global South. Revista De Estudios Políticos Y Estratégicos, 7(2), 90–105. Retrieved from https://revistas.utem.cl/index.php/EPE/article/view/26

References

ANDREOTTI, A. and MINGIONE, E. (2013). The city as a local welfare system. In N. Carmon and S. S. Fainstein (Eds.), Policy, planning and people. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

ANDREOTTI, A. and MINGIONE, E. (2014). Local welfare systems in Europe and the economic crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1-15. DOI: 10.1177/0969776414557191.

ANDREOTTI, A.; MINGIONE, E. and POLIZZI, E. (2012). Local welfare systems. A challenge for social cohesion. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1925-1940.

BÉLAND, D. and LECOURS, A. (2008). Nationalism and social policy: The politics of territorial solidarity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

BIFULCO, L. (2016). Citizenship and governance at a time of territorialization: The Italian local welfare between innovation and fragmentation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 628-644.

COX, K. R. (2013). Territory, Scale, and Why Capitalism Matter, Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 46-61.

DE VIDOVICH, L. (2017). Social Perspectives of Urban Regeneration on Neighbourhood-scale: the Case of Spanish Quarters in Naples. AESOP Annual Congress, Lisbon. Retrieve from: https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/1039100/245305/Paper%20AESOP%202017%20copia.pdf

DUKES, T. and MUSTERD, S. (2012). Towards social cohesion: bridging national integration rhetoric and local practice: the case of the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1981-1997.

DAVOUDI, S. (2008). Conceptions of the city-region: a critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 161(2), 51-60.

Ferrera, M. (2016). Rotta di collisione: euro contro welfare? Roma-Bari, Italy: Laterza and Figli Spa.

GOVERNA, F. and SALONE, C. (2004). Territories in action, territories for action: the territorial dimension of Italian local development policies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 796-818.

HOWLETT, M. and MUKHERJEE, I. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of policy formulation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

INEGI. (2015). Encuesta Intercensal 2015. Retrieve from: http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/proyectos/enchogares/especiales/intercensal/

JESSOP, B.; BRENNER, N. and JONES, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389-401.

JONAS, A. E. (2012). Region and place: Regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 263-272.

JONAS, A. E. and WOOD, A. (2016). Territory, the state and urban politics in critical perspective. Territory, the State and Urban Politics: A Critical Appreciation of the Selected Writings of Kevin R. Cox, 1. Routledge.

KEATING, M. (2013). Rescaling the European state: The making of territory and the rise of the meso. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford.

KAZEPOV, Y. (2008) The subsidiarization of social policies: actors, processes and impacts. European Societies, 10(2), 247–273. DOI: 10.1080/14616690701835337

KAZEPOV, Y. (2010) Rescaling Social Policies towards Multilevel Governance in Europe: Some Reflections on Processes at Stake and Actors Involved. In Kazepov, Y. (Ed.) Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe, 35-73. USA: Ashgate.

JONAS, A. E. (2012). Region and place: Regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 263-272.

MCEWEN, N. and MORENO, L. (2005). Exploring the Territorial Politics of Welfare. In McEwen, N., and Moreno, L. (Eds.) The Territorial Politics of Welfare, pp. 11-48. London: Routledge.

MICIUKIEWICZ, K.; MOULAERT, F.; NOVY, A.; MUSTERD, S. and HILLIER, J. (2012). Introduction: Problematising urban social cohesion: A transdisciplinary endeavour. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1855-1872.

MINGIONE, E.; OBERTI, M. and PEREIRINHA, J. (2002). Cities as local systems. Social assistance dynamics in Europe: İçinde, 35-79.

OOSTERLYNCK, S.; KAZEPOV, Y.; NOVY, A.; COOLS, P.; WUKOVITSCH, F.; SARUIS, T. and LEUBOLT, B. (2013). Exploring the multi-level governance of welfare provision and social innovation: welfare mix, welfare models and rescaling. ImPRovE Discussion Paper No. 13/12. Antwerp

PALIER, B. (1998). La référence au territoire dans les nouvelles politiques sociales. Politiques et management public, 16(3), 13-41.

PANICAN, A. and JOHANSSON, H. (2016). Strategies against poverty in a Social democratic local welfare system: still the responsibility of public actors? In Combating Poverty in Local Welfare Systems (pp. 155-177) Palgrave Macmillan, London.

RANCI, C.; BRANDSEN, T. and SABATINELLI, S. (2014). Social Vulnerability in European Cities: The Role of Local Welfare in Times of Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

SABATINELLI, S. and SEMPREBON, M. (2017). The vertical division on responsibility for social services within and beyond the State: issues in empowerment, participation and territorial cohesion. In MARTINELLI, F., ANTTONEN, A. and MÄTZKE, M. (Eds.) Social Services Disrupted. Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity, 114-134. UK-USA: Edward Elgar.

SCARPA, S. (2016). Immigration policy regimes, welfare states and urban inequality patterns: A comparison between Malmö and Genoa. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 862-877.

YANES, P. (2013). Quince años de política social en la ciudad de México, logros y desafíos, lecciones y tensiones. Revista Nueva Sociedad, 243(1), 142-152.

ZICCARDI, A. (2009). Políticas de inclusión social de la Ciudad de México. Retos para la integración social de los pobres en América Latina. USA, Argentina: Clacso.

ZICCARDI, A. (2012). Espacio público y participación ciudadana: El caso del Programa Comunitario de Mejoramiento Barrial de la Ciudad de México. Gestión y política pública, 21(SPE), 187-226

MCEWEN, N. and MORENO, L. (Eds.). (2008). The territorial politics of welfare. London; New York: Routledge.

TAYLOR-GOOBY, P. (Ed.). (2004). New risks, new welfare: the transformation of the European welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Article Details

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.