Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Jan 8, 2022
Abstract
The following work aims to present the impact of technological disruption on modern diplomacy, paying special attention to the topic of agenda skills for diplomats in the knowledge economy. Drawing from the experience of Chile of becoming a hub of innovation in Latin America after the opening of the Start-Up Chile programme, as well as from other case studies presented in the literature, the article proposes some dimensions which drive the emergence of a new component of diplomacy that I call entrepreneurship-based diplomacy. A case study of the Start-Up Chile programme is presented, and based on this information, the benefits of integrating entrepreneurship as a diplomatic instrument are concluded.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
ADLER-NISSEN, R. (2016). Diplomatic Agency. En C. CONSTANTINOU, P. KERR y P. SHARP (2016). The Sage Handbook of Diplomacy. Londres, Reino Unido: Sage.
ANHOLT, S. (2010). Definitions of place branding – Working towards a resolution. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 6(1), pp. 1-10.
BARSTON, R. (2013). Modern Diplomacy. Abingdon, Reino Unido: Routledge
BELLINI, N. y PASQUINELLI, C. (2016). Branding the innovation place. Managing the soft infrastructure of innovation. En U. HILPER (2016). Routledge Handbook of Politics and Technology. Abingdon, Reino Unido: Routledge.
CONSTANTINOU, C.; KERR, P. y SHARP, P. (2016). The Sage Handbook of Diplomacy. Londres, Reino Unido: Sage.
COOPER, A.; HEINE, J. y THAKUR, R. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
Cull, N. J. (2009). Public Diplomacy before Gullion. The evolution of a Phrase. En N. SNOW y P. M. TAYLOR. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge.
DE LEÓN, I. y DONOSO, J. F. (2017). Innovation, Startups and Intellectual Property Management. Strategies and Evidence from Latin America and other Regions. Springer International Publishing.
GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, (GEM) (2017). Global Entrepreneurship Index. Recuperado de https://thegedi.org/global-entrepreneurship-and-development-index/.
GRANT (2004). En N. WESTCOTT (2008). Digital Diplomacy: The impact of the Internet on International Relations. Research Report, (16). Oxford Internet Institute.Recuperado de: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/RR16.pdf
GREGORY, B. (2011). American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. Recuperado de https://smpa.gwu.edu/sites/smpa.gwu.edu/files/downloads/BGregory_HJD_AmericanPD.pdf
HARRIS, D. y ORTMANS, J. (2014). Startups as a form of diplomacy. Recuperado de: https://www.1776.vc/insights/startups-as-a-form-of-diplomacy/
HEINE, J. (2013). From Club to Network Diplomacy. En A. COOPER, J. HEINE y R. THAKUR (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
HILPER, U. (2016). Routledge Handbook of Politics and Technology. Abingdon, Reino Unido: Routledge.
HOCKING, B. y MELISSEN, J. (2015). Diplomacy in the Digital Age. La Haya, Holanda: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.
HOCKING, B. et al. (2012). Futures for diplomacy Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Holanda: Institute of International Relations- Clingendael.
Killion, D.T. (2013). Startup Diplomacy, the Next Big Thing for American Soft Power. The Huffington Post. Recuperado de: https://bit.ly/2QH2BPk [28 de enero 2018]
MARTIN, C. y JAGLA, L. (2013). Integrating Diplomacy and Social Media. A Report of the First Annual Aspen Institute Dialogue on Diplomacy and Technology. Washington D. C., Estados Unidos: Aspen Institute.
MCCLORY, J. (2016). The Soft Power 30. A global ranking of soft power. Portland, Estados Unidos: PR Limited.
MELISSEN, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. En J. MELISSEN (ed.). The New Public Diplomacy, Soft Power in International Relations. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Palgrave Macmillan.
MINISTERIO DE ASUNTOS EXTERIORES DE CHILE (2017). Intereses de la Política Exterior de Chile. Ver: https://minrel.gob.cl/minrel/site/artic/20080802/pags/20080802193244.html
NYE, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The means to success in world politics. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Public Affairs.
OCDE (2018). The future of education and skills. Education 2030. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
PIGMAN, G. A. (2013). The Diplomacy of Global and Transnational firms. En A. COOPER, J. HEINE y R. THAKUR (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
POTTER, E. (2002). Cyber-Diplomacy: Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Montreal, Canadá: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
RUEL, H. y WOLTERS, T. (2016). Business Diplomacy. En C. CONSTANTINOU, P. KERR y P. SHARP, P. (2016). The Sage Handbook of Diplomacy. Londres, Reino Unido: Sage.
SAFTESCU, R. (2018). Benefits of Start-Up Chile Programme on Promoting Chile’s Image Abroad. Diplomacia, (137).Santiago de Chile: Academia Diplomática de Chile Andrés Bello.
SCHMIDT, J. (2014). Between Irrelevance and Integration? New Challenges to Diplomacy in the 21st Century and the Role of the EEAS. EU Diplomacy Papers 8/2014. Brujas, Bélgica: College of Europe.
SLAUGHTER, A. M. y BAYRASLI, E. (2016). Entrepreneurship as a Diplomatic Tool. Recuperado de: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/entrepreneurship-as-a-diplomatic-tool-by-anne-marie-slaughter-and-elmira-bayrasli-2016-03
Start-Up Chile. Ver http://www.startupchile.org/
VAN HAM, P. (2008). Place Branding: The State of the Art. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. (Numero 616 (1)), p. 126.
YEOH, C. (2015). Building a Startup Ecosystem: Lessons from Chile. Recuperado de: http://www.startupchile.org/building-a-startup-ecosystem-lessons-from-chile/
